Reza Valavion; Ali Najaf zadeh
Abstract
The contract company is one of the complex legislative institutions in the civil law, which has led to the emergence of ambiguities in the society. Despite the intention of the legislator to incorporate a contractual partnership under certain contracts (Al Masami contracts) in Article 571 of the Civil ...
Read More
The contract company is one of the complex legislative institutions in the civil law, which has led to the emergence of ambiguities in the society. Despite the intention of the legislator to incorporate a contractual partnership under certain contracts (Al Masami contracts) in Article 571 of the Civil Code, why have none of the aforementioned articles taken steps in accordance with the intention of the legislator, and finally the audience will face the duality of the legislator's mentality with a wrong idea. became; Why has the legislator taken an evasive way to not deal with the contract as a unique and special reason for the civil company? If the legislator does not have an opinion on the existence of a civil company contract, then what is the justification for incorporating it into certain contracts of the civil law? Won't the spread of contract companies in people's transactions double the need to amend the civil law? Discovering a solution to these questions has led to the writing of this article; The author believes that the social necessity of heavy means due to the pressure of the society's need forced the legislator to establish the company in terms of certain contracts. However, since it could not benefit from the influence of contemporary jurists' thoughts with the formulation of civil law, and in fact, it has been caught in a limbo in the analysis of the civil partnership contract. There will be no doubt in using the contract as an exclusive reason for the realization of the civil partnership (whether in tangible or intangible property) and the mixing of properties is not necessary because the partnership will be realized without obtaining a share in the property. However, this operation with the credit of the partners will be the reason for the contract to be fulfilled, and there will be no need for a separate action, and the function of the contract will be both a reason for spreading and giving permission and permission to seize the property of the company.
